PertaDrive

Oil Rate

2,850 BOPD

Target: 4,500 BLPD

Total Liquid Rate

4,380 BLPD

WC: 35%

Reservoir Pressure (Pr)

3,200 psi

Decline: -2.1%/yr

Bottom Hole Pressure (Pwf)

2,400 psi

Drawdown: 800 psi

GOR

650 scf/STB

Trend: +12%

Wellhead Pressure

850 psi

105°F

78

Lift Efficiency

78%

81Good

Lift Health Index

81%

1. Well Stage & Lifecycle Plan

Lift method per production stage

Stage 0

Natural Flow

0–8 mo

Stage 1CURRENT

Gas Lift

8–30 mo

Stage 2

ESP

30–54 mo

Stage 3

PCP

54–72 mo

Stage 4

Late-Life

>72 mo

2. Artificial Lift Screening & Ranking

Composite scoring — technical, economic, reliability

MethodTechnicalEconomicReliabilityTotalRank
Gas Lift918894911
ESP868275812
Jet Pump767972763
PCP738470734
SRP577868575
Plunger Lift558062556
Hydraulic Pump616558617
Intermittent GL597055598

Recommended Method: GAS LIFT

View Detail Analysis

Best overall score with high technical feasibility and good economics for current well stage (Early Decline).

3. IPR & VLP Analysis

Inflow performance vs vertical lift performance

Operating Point: Q = 4,380 BLPD, Pwf = 2,400 psi — gas-lift VLP intersects the IPR; natural-flow VLP stays above the IPR (well will not flow unassisted).

4. Well Schematic & Lift Configuration

Current completion & lift setup

Reservoir02K4K6K8K10KGLV7,900 ft MDWellhead850 psi / 105°F

Current Configuration

Lift MethodGas Lift
Injection Rate1.8 MMscfd
Operating Depth7,900 ft MD
Tubing ID2.875 in
Casing7 in
Perforation8,200–8,400 ft
TVD9,800 ft
MD10,300 ft
Inclination62°
Temperature210°F

5. Gas Lift Optimization

Production vs Injection GasValve DesignSensitivityCompressor Check

Current injection 1.8 MMscfd — inside the optimal band; incremental gas beyond 2.1 MMscfd adds slippage and compressor cost without liquid gain.

6. ESP Design (Future Option)

Candidate sizing for Stage 2

Pump CurveDesign SummaryGas HandlingSensitivity

ESP Design (For Stage 2)

6,000 BPD @ 7,700 ft

60% pump efficiency at BEP

ESP Feasibility

Feasible — Stage 2 (30–54 mo)

Gas separator required (GVF > 10%)

7. Economics Comparison (NPV)

Upside vs downside risk per lift method

Gas Lift carries the highest NPV index (1.12) with the lowest downside risk — consistent with the screening recommendation.

8. Stage Recommendation

Lift method switchpoints over well life

StageTiming (Months)Recommended Method
Stage 00–8Natural Flow
Stage 18–30Gas LiftCURRENT
Stage 230–54ESP
Stage 354–72PCP
Stage 4>72Late-Life Optimization

Switchpoints trigger on reservoir-pressure decline (Pr < ~2,800 psi → Stage 2 review) and rising water cut.

9. Lift Health & Diagnostics

Current: 81 — Good

81 · Good

0255075100
Excellent85–100
Good65–85
Needs Review45–65
Critical<45

Maintenance Notes

  • Gas lift valve #3 shows early wear — schedule inspection next shutdown.
  • Injection gas rate trending +4% month-over-month; verify against optimal band.
  • Tubing head pressure stable; no annulus anomalies detected.

Demo data — SmartLift goes live when the well & lift equipment dataset is connected.